refers into a landmark case decided via the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Right here’s a brief overview:
The main focus is on the intention to cause injury. This is a major challenge: a very small threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.
These platforms empower individuals to understand their legal rights and obligations, advertising a more informed and just society.
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed from the bank and considering that only the appellants were posted on the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
R.O, Office, Gujranwala and the police officials didn't inform him that the identification parade from the accused hasn't been conducted still. In the moment case, now the accused attempted to get advantage of This system aired by SAMAA News, wherein the picture of the petitioner was greatly circulated. The police should not have uncovered the identity in the accused through electronic media. The law lends assurance to the accused that the identity should not be subjected to the witnesses, particularly for the witness to identify the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer set a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and manufactured pictures. Other than, the images shown over the media reveal that a mask was not placed over the accused to cover his identity right up until he was place up for an identification parade. Making pictures in the accused publically, either by showing the same into the witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or system, would create doubt during the proceedings from the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to be sure that there is not any likelihood for the witness to begin to see the accused before going to your identification parade. The accused should not be shown to the witness in person or through any other method, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or perhaps the press or electronic media. Provided the reasons elaborated previously mentioned, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(two), Cr.P.C.
Please use a single username and password set from the options. If it does not work please test the other. Each and every allows single user access only - so please remember to log off properly when you have concluded your session in Manupatra.
only on the ground of miscases remanded & only on the ground of misreading of evidence only about the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
48 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice with the Peace u/s 22-A is just not obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing to the accused party; nor obliged to essentially or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to take into account all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal regulation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a lot of the relevant factors. Read more
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to make sure the Act's effective implementation in line with its initial purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor diploma(s) in the subject of cooperative societies. Read more
This case has long been cited in several subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional legislation, judicial independence, plus the rule of law.
Case regulation, also known as precedent, forms the foundation on the Pakistani legal system. Understanding relevant judgments and rulings is critical for interpreting statutes and predicting legal results. Free access to these resources democratizes legal knowledge, empowering citizens and selling transparency.
Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by regulation." It can be properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
When the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a here chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only carried out In case the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence as well as the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as a result they were nicely aware about the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use for being seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
This section specifically applies to civil servants who are rendered surplus as a result of reorganization or abolition of the division, department, or office. Non-civil servants, by definition, are not topic for the provisions with the Civil Servants Act. Their terms and conditions of service are typically governed by separate contracts or agreements with the using organization. Therefore, the provisions of Section eleven-A, including the possibility of being posted to another department, would not apply to non-civil servants. Read more